CAP Theorem and Its Implications

The CAP theorem tells us that when data is distributed across multiple servers, you can only guarantee two out of these three properties: Consistency, Availability, and Partition Tolerance. Let's understand what these properties mean.

Consistency means all users see the same data at the same time, no matter which server they connect to. If you update some data, all subsequent reads will return that updated value.

Availability means the system remains operational and responds to requests even if some servers fail. Every request to a working server should receive a response, whether it succeeds or fails.

Partition Tolerance means the system continues to work even when network issues prevent servers from communicating with each other. This is crucial in distributed systems because network problems are inevitable.

Since network partitions are inevitable, you're forced to choose between consistency and availability.

If you choose Consistency over Availability (CP systems): The system will return an error or timeout if it can't ensure consistent data. Example: Google Cloud Spanner

If you choose Availability over Consistency (AP systems): The system will return the most recent available data, which might be stale. Example: Apache Cassandra

The choice between CP and AP depends on your application's needs:

Use CP when accurate data is crucial (e.g banking, financial systems, stock trading, ticket booking platform, inventory system)

Use AP when the system must stay operational even with stale data (e.g social media app, content delivery, business review service, streaming service)

Here's a comparison of CP vs AP systems:

PropertyCP SystemsAP Systems
During Network PartitionMay become unavailableMay return stale data
Data AccuracyAlways consistentEventually consistent
Use CasesFinancial systemsSocial media
ExamplesSpannerCassandra
Choosing Between CP and AP Systems in Real World Examples

๐Ÿ’ณ ๐—•๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ธ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด (CP) โ†’ Choose consistency over availability. When network splits, reject transactions rather than risk double-spending. Better to show "service unavailable" than process a payment twice.

๐Ÿ“ฑ ๐—ฆ๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐— ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฎ (AP) โ†’ Choose availability over consistency. Users can still post and browse during network issues. Seeing an old profile pic for a few minutes is better than Instagram going down.

๐ŸŽซ ๐—ง๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด (Mixed) โ†’ Different features need different guarantees. Seat booking must be consistent (no double-booking seat 6A). But browsing showtimes? Availability wins - show last cached data rather than error out.

CAP Theorem in Practice

When building distributed systems, you'll often hear about the CAP theorem. It states that when data is distributed across multiple servers, you can only have two out of these three properties: Consistency, Availability, and Partition Tolerance. Let's understand what this means in practice.

Consistency means all servers have the same data at any given time. If you write data to one server, all other servers should show this updated data. Availability means the system remains operational even if some servers fail. Partition Tolerance means the system continues to work even when network issues prevent servers from communicating with each other.

In real distributed systems, network partitions will happen. Servers will lose connection with each other due to network issues, hardware failures, or maintenance. This means Partition Tolerance isn't really optional, you must have it. So practically, you're choosing between Consistency and Availability.

If you choose Consistency over Availability (CP system), when a network partition occurs, some parts of your system become unavailable to maintain consistency. For example, if two database servers can't communicate, one might stop accepting writes to prevent inconsistent data.

If you choose Availability over Consistency (AP system), your system keeps working during network partitions, but different servers might show different data temporarily. Once the network issues resolve, the servers sync up their data.

Here's how popular databases handle this trade-off:

DatabaseCAP ChoiceBest For
MongoDBAPFinancial transactions
CassandraAlways consistentBanking applications
PostgreSQLCPSocial media
DynamoDBAPShopping carts